Back
Pipedream vs n8n
Trust Score comparison · March 2026
Signal Comparison
N/AN/A200k / wk
200 commitsCommits (90d)400 commits
9k ★GitHub stars50k ★
100 q'sStack Overflow500 q's
MediumCommunityHigh
Pipedreamn8n
Key Differences
| Factor | Pipedream | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| License | Proprietary | Sustainable Use License |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Hosted | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Free tier | — | — |
| Open Source | — | ✓ Yes |
| TypeScript | ✓ | ✓ |
Pick Pipedream if…
- Connecting webhooks and SaaS APIs with a code-friendly workflow builder
- Developers who want Zapier-like automation but with full Node.js/Python code steps
- Prototyping event-driven integrations without managing servers
Pick n8n if…
- Automating internal workflows connecting SaaS tools (Slack, GitHub, Notion, etc.)
- Teams who want Zapier flexibility with self-hosting capability and custom code nodes
- Building data pipelines or AI agent workflows with a visual interface
Side-by-side Quick Start
Pipedream
// Pipedream workflow step (Node.js code step)
export default defineComponent({
async run({ steps, $ }) {
const response = await axios($, {
method: 'GET',
url: 'https://api.example.com/data',
headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.API_KEY}` },
});
return response.data;
},
});n8n
# Self-host with Docker
docker run -it --rm --name n8n -p 5678:5678 \
-v ~/.n8n:/home/node/.n8n \
docker.n8n.io/n8nio/n8n
# Open http://localhost:5678 to build workflows visually
# Or use the CLI:
npx n8nCommunity Verdict
Based on upvoted notes🏆
n8n wins this comparison
Trust Score 82 vs 74 · 8-point difference
n8n leads on Trust Score with stronger signal data across downloads and community health. That said, the other tool is worth considering if your use case matches its specific strengths above.