Back
Jotai vs TanStack Query
Trust Score comparison · March 2026
VS
Trust Score Δ
11
🏆 TanStack Query wins
Signal Comparison
1.5M / wknpm downloads8M / wk
50 commitsCommits (90d)140 commits
19k ★GitHub stars43k ★
600 q'sStack Overflow8k q's
MediumCommunityHigh
JotaiTanStack Query
Key Differences
| Factor | Jotai | TanStack Query |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Hosted | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Free tier | — | — |
| Open Source | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| TypeScript | ✓ | ✓ |
Pick Jotai if…
- Fine-grained, atom-level state where components subscribe to minimal slices
- You like Recoil's mental model but want a smaller, maintained library
- Next.js apps that need React Suspense-compatible async atoms
Pick TanStack Query if…
- Managing server state (API data) in React apps — replaces useEffect + useState
- You need automatic cache invalidation, background refetching, and pagination
- Building dashboards or data-heavy UIs where stale data causes bugs
Side-by-side Quick Start
Jotai
import { atom, useAtom } from 'jotai';
const countAtom = atom(0);
function Counter() {
const [count, setCount] = useAtom(countAtom);
return <button onClick={() => setCount(c => c + 1)}>{count}</button>;
}TanStack Query
import { useQuery } from '@tanstack/react-query';
function UserProfile({ id }) {
const { data, isLoading } = useQuery({
queryKey: ['user', id],
queryFn: () => fetch(`/api/users/${id}`).then(r => r.json()),
});
if (isLoading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
return <p>{data.name}</p>;
}Community Verdict
Based on upvoted notes🏆
TanStack Query wins this comparison
Trust Score 91 vs 80 · 11-point difference
TanStack Query leads on Trust Score with stronger signal data across downloads and community health. That said, the other tool is worth considering if your use case matches its specific strengths above.