Back

Helicone vs LangSmith

Trust Score comparison · March 2026

Helicone
73
Trust
Fair
View profile
VS
Trust Score Δ
7
🏆 LangSmith wins
LangSmith
80
Trust
Good
View profile

Signal Comparison

18k / wknpm downloads2.5M / wk
180 commitsCommits (90d)220 commits
3k ★GitHub stars3.5k ★
20 q'sStack Overflow200 q's
MediumCommunityHigh
HeliconeLangSmith

Key Differences

FactorHeliconeLangSmith
LicenseApache 2.0Proprietary
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript / Python
HostedSelf-hostedSelf-hosted
Free tier
Open Source✓ Yes
TypeScript

Pick Helicone if…

  • You want minimal-friction observability — just change your base URL
  • Caching identical LLM requests to cut costs
  • Quick cost and latency dashboards without SDK changes

Pick LangSmith if…

  • Your app is built on LangChain or LangGraph — integration is seamless
  • You need prompt management and dataset-driven evaluations
  • Team wants a managed cloud with minimal setup

Side-by-side Quick Start

Helicone
import OpenAI from 'openai';

const client = new OpenAI({
  apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY,
  baseURL: 'https://oai.helicone.ai/v1',
  defaultHeaders: { 'Helicone-Auth': `Bearer ${process.env.HELICONE_API_KEY}` },
});

// All calls are now logged automatically
LangSmith
import { Client } from 'langsmith';

const client = new Client({ apiKey: process.env.LANGSMITH_API_KEY });

// Auto-traces when LANGCHAIN_TRACING_V2=true is set
// Or manually:
const run = await client.createRun({
  name: 'my-llm-call',
  run_type: 'llm',
  inputs: { prompt: 'Hello' },
});

Community Verdict

Based on upvoted notes
🏆
LangSmith wins this comparison
Trust Score 80 vs 73 · 7-point difference

LangSmith leads on Trust Score with stronger signal data across downloads and community health. That said, the other tool is worth considering if your use case matches its specific strengths above.