Loading…
Loading…
Trust Score comparison · April 2026
| Factor | GitHub Actions | Pulumi |
|---|---|---|
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| Language | YAML | TypeScript / Python |
| Hosted | Yes | Self-hosted |
| Free tier | ✓ Yes | — |
| Open Source | — | ✓ Yes |
| TypeScript | — | ✓ |
# .github/workflows/ci.yml
name: CI
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '20'
- run: npm ci
- run: npm test
deploy:
needs: test
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
steps:
- run: vercel --prod --token ${{ secrets.VERCEL_TOKEN }}import * as aws from '@pulumi/aws';
const bucket = new aws.s3.Bucket('my-bucket', {
acl: 'private',
tags: { Environment: 'production' },
});
export const bucketName = bucket.id;Pulumi leads on Trust Score with stronger signal data across downloads and community health. That said, the other tool is worth considering if your use case matches its specific strengths above.