Loading…
Loading…
Trust Score comparison · April 2026
| Factor | Celery | Temporal |
|---|---|---|
| License | BSD | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript / Python |
| Hosted | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Free tier | — | — |
| Open Source | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| TypeScript | — | ✓ |
from celery import Celery
app = Celery('tasks', broker='redis://localhost:6379/0')
@app.task
def send_welcome_email(user_id: int):
user = User.objects.get(id=user_id)
email_service.send_welcome(user.email)
@app.task
def process_upload(file_path: str):
result = run_etl_pipeline(file_path)
return result
# Trigger from your view:
send_welcome_email.delay(user.id)
# Run worker:
# celery -A tasks worker --loglevel=infoimport { Worker, NativeConnection } from '@temporalio/worker';
import { workflowFn } from './workflows';
const worker = await Worker.create({
connection: await NativeConnection.connect({ address: 'localhost:7233' }),
namespace: 'default',
taskQueue: 'my-queue',
workflowsPath: require.resolve('./workflows'),
activities: { greet: async (name) => `Hello, ${name}!` },
});
await worker.run();Celery leads on Trust Score with stronger signal data across downloads and community health. That said, the other tool is worth considering if your use case matches its specific strengths above.